The experiments conducted focused on surface tension, density, and viscosity of liquids. The surface tension coin drop experiment involved testing the surface tension of different liquids by counting the number of drops a coin could hold before the liquid's surface tension broke. The results showed that the experiment aligned approximately with the researched measurements. The density tower experiment aimed to create a tower using liquids with different densities and observe their layering effect. The results aligned with pre-existing density towers and researched densities, confirming their accuracy and validity. The viscosity race experiment compared the viscosities of different liquids by measuring the time it took for them to travel down a ramp. The available data for viscosity were limited, but the observed differences between researched and conducted experiments provided meaningful insights, lending credibility to the findings. These experiments highlight the importance of continuous fact-checking, self-research, and self-experimentation to deepen understanding and uncover new insights. It is recommended for future research to expand the scope, parameters, and available data in these experiments to enhance knowledge in these areas. The research conducted has limitations, including scarcity of viscosity data, variations in experimental conditions, limited generalizability, instrumentation limitations, and potential human error. These limitations should be addressed in future experiments to improve the reliability and validity of the findings.
- Quote paper
- Eliezer Cabanas (Author), Aki Sato Kato (Author), Honey Lou R. Malig-on (Author), Romel Andrew B. Romero (Author), Louise A. Sacabin (Author), 2023, Comparing Data Between Self-Experimentation and Publicly Available Results, Munich, GRIN Verlag, https://www.hausarbeiten.de/document/1458351
